Loyola (Md.)
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,144  Christina Daniels FR 21:45
1,221  Erica Canas SR 21:51
1,967  Mary Sutton FR 22:40
2,026  Sarah Askine SO 22:44
2,355  Kendyl Fahmy SO 23:11
2,884  Caitlyn McGuinness JR 24:19
2,886  Sara Gilson SR 24:20
2,929  Courtney Wallace FR 24:30
3,163  Casie Morgan SO 25:41
3,225  Gabrielle Silvestri FR 26:06
3,275  Emily Richards JR 26:30
National Rank #245 of 339
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #23 of 37
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 23rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 3.8%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Christina Daniels Erica Canas Mary Sutton Sarah Askine Kendyl Fahmy Caitlyn McGuinness Sara Gilson Courtney Wallace Casie Morgan Gabrielle Silvestri Emily Richards
Paul Short Invitational (Gold) 10/02 24:20 25:10 26:09 26:48
Princeton Invitational 10/17 1314 21:34 21:50 22:37 22:54 24:52 24:12 24:32 25:44 25:47 26:37
Patriot League Championships 10/31 1291 21:57 22:01 22:37 22:57 23:06 24:10 24:31 24:16 26:13 26:21 25:59
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/13 1309 21:49 21:44 22:56 22:32 23:59 24:14 24:55





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 22.9 664 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.8 2.9 10.6 22.8 27.2 22.4 11.2 1.9 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Christina Daniels 93.2
Erica Canas 98.7
Mary Sutton 148.6
Sarah Askine 151.7
Kendyl Fahmy 172.1
Caitlyn McGuinness 202.4
Sara Gilson 202.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 0.8% 0.8 19
20 2.9% 2.9 20
21 10.6% 10.6 21
22 22.8% 22.8 22
23 27.2% 27.2 23
24 22.4% 22.4 24
25 11.2% 11.2 25
26 1.9% 1.9 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0